Systems and methods to recommend templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods to recommend templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment are described herein. Exemplary implementations may: manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment; manage information defining project-level graphical user interfaces; monitor use of the collaboration environment by the users determined metric values for use metrics of the users; create templates for the project-level graphical user interfaces based on the metric values; generate and deliver template recommendations for the project-level graphical user interfaces; effectuate presentation of the project-level graphical user interfaces for the individual projects in the collaboration environment; and/or perform other operations.

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates to systems and methods to recommend templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment.

BACKGROUND

Collaboration environments, sometimes referred to as work management platforms, may enable users to assign projects, tasks, or other assignments to assignees (e.g., other users) to complete. A collaboration environment may comprise an environment in which individual users and/or a virtual team of users does its work and may enable users to work in a more organized and efficient manner. Projects are a way to organize groups of tasks.

SUMMARY

One aspect of the present disclosure relates to a system configured to recommend templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment. Generating a succinct overview, or “dashboard” of a project may be difficult because the project may be associated with a variety of project information. From a practical standpoint, a user may only be interested in certain information. One or more implementations presented herein propose generating a project-level graphical user interface intended to provide a detailed, and focused, overview of a project. Instead of having users manually organize and format the information presented in the project-level graphical user interface, metrics about how users use the collaboration environment may be determined. Values of these metrics may reflect the type of project information that is important to the users and/or at least consistently viewed and/or interacted with by the users during their use of the collaboration environment. Based on the values of these metrics, templates for the project-level graphical user interfaces may be created and recommended to the users. The templates may preconfigure the project-level graphical user interfaces with the project information deemed important to the users and/or at least consistently viewed and/or interacted with by the users during their use of the collaboration environment. The recommended templates may be presented to the users so to have a customized, detailed, and focused dashboards of projects.

One or more implementations of a system to recommended templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment may include one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions and/or other components. Executing the machine-readable instructions may cause the one or more hardware processors to facilitate recommending templates for the project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment. The machine-readable instructions may include one or more computer program components. The one or more computer program components may include one or more of an environment state component, a use metric component, a template component, a user interface component, and/or other components.

The environment state component may be configured to manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment and/or other information. The collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment. The environment state information may define one or more of work unit records, project records, and/or other records. The work unit records may include work information comprising values of work unit parameters defining units of work managed, created, and/or assigned to the users within the collaboration environment. The project records may include project information comprising values for project parameters associated with projects managed within the collaboration environment. An individual project may include an individual set of the units of work.

The environment state component may be configured to manage information defining project-level graphical user interfaces of the collaboration environment. The individual project-level graphical user interfaces may correspond to individual projects. The individual project-level graphical user interfaces may include individual sets of interface elements displaying the values of one or more of the project parameters of the individual projects. By way of non-limiting illustration, a first project-level graphical user interface may be associated with a first project.

The use metric component may be configured to monitor use of the collaboration environment by the users to determine metric values for use metrics of the users and/or other information.

The template component may be configured to create templates for the project-level graphical user interfaces based on the metric values and/or other information. The templates may pre-configure the project-level graphical user interfaces to include one or more interface elements displaying the values of given ones of the project parameters. By way of non-limiting illustration, a first template for the first project-level graphical user interface may be created. The first template may include a first set of interface elements having a first subset of interface elements preconfigured by the first template based on the metric values of use metrics for a set of users.

The user interface component may be configured to generate and deliver recommendations including the templates for the project-level graphical user interfaces to one or more computing platforms of one or more of the users. By way on non-limiting illustration a first recommendation including the first template may be generated and delivered to a first computing platform of a first user.

As used herein, any association (or relation, or reflection, or indication, or correspondency) involving servers, processors, client computing platforms, and/or another entity or object that interacts with any part of the system and/or plays a part in the operation of the system, may be a one-to-one association, a one-to-many association, a many-to-one association, and/or a many-to-many association or N-to-M association (note that N and M may be different numbers greater than 1).

These and other features, and characteristics of the present technology, as well as the methods of operation and functions of the related elements of structure and the combination of parts and economies of manufacture, will become more apparent upon consideration of the following description and the appended claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of this specification, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. As used in the specification and in the claims, the singular form of “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a system configured to recommend templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations.

FIG. 2 illustrates a method to recommend templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations.

FIG. 3 illustrates a user interface, in accordance with one or more implementations.

FIG. 4 illustrates a user interface, in accordance with one or more implementations.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 illustrates a system 100 configured to recommend templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations. The system 100 may monitor one or more users within a collaboration environment to determine metric values of use metrics. The metric values may be used as a basis to create one or more templates for one or more project-level graphical user interfaces. A recommended template may present interface elements corresponding to values of a project's parameters. A recommended template may be presented to one or more computing platforms of one or more users, providing users with a high-level description of a project which corresponds to how they use the collaboration environment.

In some implementations, system 100 may include one or more of one or more servers 102, one or more client computing platforms 104, external resources 126, and/or other components. Server(s) 102 may be configured to communicate with one or more client computing platforms 104 according to a client/server architecture and/or other architectures. Client computing platform(s) 104 may be configured to communicate with other client computing platforms via server(s) 102 and/or according to a peer-to-peer architecture and/or other architectures. Users may access system 100 via client computing platform(s) 104.

Server(s) 102 may include one or more of non-transitory electronic storage 128, one or more processors 130 configured by machine-readable instructions 106, and/or other components. The non-transitory electronic storage 128 may store one or more records and/or other information. Machine-readable instructions 106 may include one or more instruction components. The instruction components may include computer program components. Executing the machine-readable instructions 106 may cause server(s) 102 to facilitate recommending templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment. The computer program components may include one or more of an environment state component 108, a use metric component 110, a template component 112, a user interface component 114, and/or other components.

Environment state component 108 may be configured to manage environment state information and/or other information used in maintaining a collaboration environment. The collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users within the collaboration environment. The environment state information may include one or more of user records, work unit records, project records, objective records, and/or other records. The user records may include user information comprising values of user parameters. The work unit records which may include work information comprising values for work unit parameters associated with units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment. The project records may include project information including values for project parameters associated with projects managed within the collaboration environment. An individual project may include an individual set of the units of work.

The user information in the user records may include values of user parameters. The values of the user parameters may be organized in user records corresponding to users interacting with and/or viewing the collaboration environment. The values of the user parameters may include information describing the users, their actions within the collaboration environment, their settings, and/or other user information; and/or metadata associated with the users, their actions within the environment, their settings, and/or other user information. Individual ones of the users may be associated with individual ones of the user records. A user record may define values of the user parameters associated with a given user.

The values of the user parameters may, by way of non-limiting example, specify one or more of: a user name, a group parameter, a user account, user role information, a user department, descriptive user content, a to-email, a from-email, a photo, an organization, a workspace, one or more user comments, one or more teams the user belongs to, one or more of the user display settings (e.g., colors, size, project order, task order, other unit of work order, etc.), one or more authorized applications, one or more interaction parameters (e.g., indicating a user is working on/worked on a given unit of work, a given user viewed a given work unit of work, a given user selected a given unit of work, a timeframe a given user last interacted with and/or worked on a given unit of work, a time period that a given unit of work has been idle, and/or other interaction parameters), one or more notification settings, one or more progress parameters, status information for one or more work units the user is associated with (units of work assigned to the user, assigned to other users by the user, completed by the user, past-due date, and/or other information), progress information for one or more business objectives the user is associated with (business objectives owned by the user, of which the user is a collaborator, fulfilled by the user, past-due date, and/or other information), one or more performance/productivity metrics of a given user (e.g., how many units of work the user has completed, how quickly the user completed the units of work, how quickly the user completes certain types of work units, the efficiency of the user, bandwidth of the user, activity level of the user, how many business objectives the user has helped fulfill through their completion of units of work, etc.), application access information (e.g., username/password for one or more third-party applications), one or more favorites and/or priorities, schedule information, and/or other information.

User role information may specify individual roles of the individual users. A role may represent a position of an individual user. The position may be specified based on a description of one or more of a job title, level, stage, and/or other descriptions of position. The role may be specified with respect to a business organization as a whole and/or other specifications. By way of non-limiting illustration, a role may include one or more of chief executive officer (or other officer), owner, manager, supervisor, accountant, associate, employee, intern, entry level, midlevel, senior, administrator, director, foreman, engineer, product developer, human resource officer, artist, art director, and/or other descriptions.

The work information in the work unit records may include values of one or more work unit parameters. The values of the work unit parameters may be organized in work unit records corresponding to units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment. A given unit of work may have one or more assignees and/or collaborators working on the given work unit. Units of work may include one or more to-do items, action items, objectives, and/or other units of work one or more users should accomplish and/or plan on accomplishing. Units of work may be created by a given user for the given user and/or created by the given user and assigned to one or more other users. Individual units of work may include one or more of an individual task, an individual sub-task, and/or other units of work assigned to and/or associated with one or more users. Individual units of work may include one or more digital content items. An individual unit of work may include an individual digital content item by virtue of the individual digital content item (and/or a copy or instance thereof) being attached and/or appended thereto. A digital content item may include one or more of an image, a video, an audio file, a PDF, a word document, and/or other digital content items.

Individual sets of work unit records may be defined by a record hierarchy. A record hierarchy may convey individual positions of work unit records (and their corresponding units of work) in the record hierarchy. By way of non-limiting illustration, a position may specify one or more of a work unit record being superior to another work unit record, a work unit record being subordinate to another work unit record, and/or other information. As a result, individual work unit records in the individual sets of work unit records may be subordinate to other individual work unit records in the individual sets of work unit records. For example, a work unit record may define a unit of work comprising a task, and a subordinate work unit record may define a unit of work comprising a sub-task to the task. A record hierarchy may define a relationship between work unit records. A work unit record may have some restrictions placed on it by virtue of having a subordinate work unit record. By way of non-limiting illustration, a work unit record may be restricted from access by one or more users unless and/or until a subordinate work unit record is completed and/or started.

Individual work unit records may include hierarchical information defining a record hierarchy of the individual work unit records. The hierarchical information of a work unit record may include one or more of information identifying other work unit records associated in a record hierarchy the work unit record belongs to, a specification of the position of the work unit record in the hierarchy, restrictions and/or other relationships placed on the work unit record by virtue of its position, and/or other information.

In some implementations, the one or more work unit parameters may include one or more of a work assignment parameter, a work management parameter, work creation parameter, and/or other parameters. The values of the work assignment parameter may describe units of work assigned to the individual users. The values of the work management parameter may describe units of work managed by the individual users. The values of the work creation parameter may describe units of work created by the individual users.

In some implementations, values of work unit parameters may include one or more of a unit of work name, a unit of work description, one or more unit of work dates (e.g., a start date, a due date or end date, a completion date, and/or dates), one or more members associated with a unit of work (e.g., an owner, one or more other project/task collaborators, collaborator access information, and/or other unit of work collaborators and/or collaborator information), a status parameter (e.g., an update, a hardcoded status update, a completed/incomplete/mark complete, a measured status, a progress indicator, quantity of sub-work units remaining for a given unit of work, measure of urgency, and/or other status parameter), one or more user comment parameters (e.g., permission for who may make comments such as an assignee, an assignor, a recipient, one or more followers, and/or one or more other interested parties; content of the comments; one or more times; presence or absence of the functionality of up-votes; one or more hard-coded responses; and/or other parameters), one or more interaction parameters (e.g., indicating a given unit of work is being worked on/was worked on, a given work unit of work was viewed, a given unit of work was selected, how long the given unit of work has been idle, a last interaction parameter indicating when and what user last interacted with the given unit of work, users that interacted with the given unit of work, quantity and/or content of comments on the unit of work, and/or other interaction parameters indicating sources of the interactions, context of the interactions, content of the interactions and/or time for the interactions), one or more digital content item attachments, notification settings, privacy, an associated URL, one or more interaction parameters (e.g., sources of the interactions, context of the interactions, content of the interactions, time for the interactions, and/or other interaction parameters), updates, ordering of units of work within a given unit of work (e.g., tasks within a project, subtasks within a task, etc.), state of a workspace for a given unit of work (e.g., application state parameters, application status, application interactions, user information, and/or other parameters related to the state of the workspace for a unit of work), one or more performance/productivity metrics for a given unit of work, hierarchical information, one or more custom fields (e.g., priority, cost, stage, and/or other custom fields), and/or other information.

The values of the work assignment parameter describing units of work assigned to the individual users may be determined based on one or more interactions by one or more users with a collaboration environment. In some implementations, one or more users may create and/or assign one or more unit of work to themselves and/or another user. In some implementations, a user may be assigned a unit of work and the user may effectuate a reassignment of the unit of work from the user or one or more other users.

In some implementations, values of the work assignment parameter may indicate that a status parameter of a unit of work has changed from “incomplete” to “marked complete” and/or “complete”. In some implementations, a status of complete for a unit of work may be associated with the passing of an end date associated with the unit of work. In some implementations, a status of “marked complete” may be associated with a user providing input via the collaboration environment at the point in time the user completes the unit of work (which may be before or after an end date).

In some implementations, managing by the environment state component 108 include maintaining queues of the units of work assigned to the users. The queues may be presented to the users in a user interface of the collaboration environment to facilitate access to the units of work via work unit pages. Individual queues may represent the units of work assigned to individual users organized in an order based on the individual end dates and/or other dates (e.g., start dates) and/or other ordering. Individual queues may be presented in a user interface based on one or more of a list view, a calendar view, and/or other views. The calendar view may be a calendar view by week, by more than one week (e.g., 1^(st) through 15^(th)), by month, by more than one month (e.g., May through July), and/or other calendar views. Units of work may be representing in a calendar view by user interface elements (e.g., icons, calendar entries, etc.).

Project information in project records may define values of project parameters for projects managed within the collaboration environment. The project parameters may characterize one or more projects managed within the collaboration environment and/or via the collaboration environment, and/or the metadata associated with the one or more projects. Individual ones of the projects may be associated with individual ones of the project records. The project information may define values of the project parameters associated with a given project managed within the collaboration environment and/or via the collaboration environment. A given project may have one or more owners and/or one or more collaborators working on the given project. The given project may include one or more units of work assigned to one or more users under the given project heading. In some implementations, projects may include one or more units of work that may directly facilitate progress toward fulfillment of the projects. Accordingly, completion of the set of units of work may directly contribute to progress toward fulfillment of the project. By way of non-limiting illustration, an individual project may be associated with a client and the units of work under the individual project heading may be work directly contributing to the fulfillment of a business relationship with the client.

The values of the project parameters may, by way of non-limiting example, include one or more of: one or more units of work within individual ones of the projects (which may include values of parameters defined by one or more work unit records), one or more user comment parameters (e.g., a creator, a recipient, one or more followers, one or more other interested parties, content, one or more times, upvotes, other hard-coded responses, etc.), a project name, a project description, one or more project dates (e.g., a start date, a due date, a completion date, and/or other project dates), one or more project collaborators (e.g., an owner, one or more other project collaborators, collaborator access information, and/or other project collaborators and/or collaborator information), a status and/or progress (e.g., an update, a hardcoded status update, a measured status, quantity of units of work remaining in a given project, completed units of work in a given project, and/or other status parameter), one or more attachments, notification settings, privacy, an associated URL, one or more interaction parameters (e.g., sources of the interactions, context of the interactions, content of the interactions, time for the interactions, and/or other interaction parameters), updates, ordering of units of work within the given project, state of a workspace for a given task within the given project, and/or other information.

The objective information in objective records may include values of one or more objective parameters. The values of the objective parameters may be organized in objective records corresponding to business objectives managed, created, and/or owned within the collaboration environment. A given business objective may have one or more collaborators, and/or team members working on the given business objective. Business objectives may include one or more associated units of work and/or projects one or more users should accomplish and/or plan on accomplishing. Business objectives may be created by a given user for the given user and/or created by the given user and assigned to be owned to one or more other users. Individual business objectives may include one or more of an individual goal, an individual sub-goal, and/or other business objectives assigned to be owned by a user and/or associated with one or more users.

The business objectives may be associated with a set of units of work and/or projects that may indirectly facilitate progress toward fulfillment of the business objectives. The set of units of work and/or projects may not directly contribute to the progress. By way of non-limiting illustration, a connection between the set of units of work and/or projects and a corresponding business objective may be indirect in that completion of at least one of the units of work and/or projects may have no direct impact on progress toward fulfillment of the business objective. The concept of “no direct impact” may mean that completion of the at least one unit of work and/or project may not cause progress toward fulfillment of the business objective without independent action outside of the at least one unit of work and/or project. Instead, the fulfillment of the at least one unit of work and/or project may make such independent action more likely (e.g., through coercion, assistance, education, incentivization, reminder, etc.). However, in some implementations, business objectives may be associated with a set of units of work and/or projects that may directly facilitate progress toward fulfillment of the business objectives. Accordingly, completion of the set of units of work and/or projects may directly contribute to the progress toward fulfillment. Business objectives may be associated with an objectives and key result (OKR) goal-setting framework. Business objectives may be specified on one or more of a team basis, organization basis, and/or other specifications. In some implementations, business objectives may be characterized as user objectives. The user objectives may be associated with a set of units of work and/or projects that may indirectly (and/or directly) facilitate progress toward fulfillment of the user objectives. User objectives may be specified on an individual user basis.

Individual objective records may describe individual business objectives and identify sets of individual ones of the work unit records and/or project records that specify the units of work and/or projects as being associated with the individual business objectives.

Individual sets of objective records may be defined by an objective record hierarchy. An objective record hierarchy may convey individual positions of objective records (and their corresponding business objectives) in the objective record hierarchy. By way of non-limiting illustration, a position may specify one or more of an objective record being superior to one or more other objective records, an objective record being subordinate to one or more other objective records, and/or other information. As a result, individual objective records may be subordinate and/or superior to other individual objective records. For example, the objective records may further include a second objective record. The first objective record and the second objective record may be organized by a first objective record hierarchy specifying that the second objective record is subordinate to the first objective record.

An objective record may define a business objective comprising a progress towards fulfillment, and a subordinate objective record may define a business objective comprising a subordinate progress towards fulfillment to the subordinate business objective. An objective record hierarchy may define a relationship between objective records.

Individual objective records may include hierarchical information defining an objective record hierarchy of the individual objective records. The hierarchical information of an objective record may include one or more of information identifying other objective records associated in an objective record hierarchy the objective record belongs to, a specification of the position of the objective record in the hierarchy, other relationships placed on the objective record by virtue of its position, and/or other information.

In some implementations, as a consequence of the objective record hierarchies, the individual business objectives described in the individual objective records that are subordinate to the other individual objective records may be subordinate to the individual business objectives in the other individual objective records.

In some implementations, the one or more objective parameters may include one or more of an objective definition parameter, an objective owner parameter, an objective management parameter, an objective creation parameter, an objective progress parameter, and/or other parameters. The value of the objective definition parameter may describe the particular business objective. The values of the objective owner parameter may describe business objectives assigned to be owned by an individual user. The values of the objective management parameter may describe business objectives managed as collaborators by the individual users. The values of the objective creation parameter may describe business objectives created by the individual users.

In some implementations, the business objectives may be described based on one or more of a business objective name, a business objective description, one or more business objective dates (e.g., a start date, a due date, and/or dates), one or more members associated with a business objective (e.g., an owner, one or more other project/task members, member access information, and/or other business objective members and/or member information), progress information (e.g., an update, a hardcoded status update, a measured status, a progress indicator, quantity value remaining for a given business objective, completed work units in a given project, and/or other progress information), one or more interaction parameters, notification settings, privacy, an associated URL, one or more custom fields (e.g., priority, cost, stage, and/or other custom fields), and/or other information.

The values of the objective owner parameter describing business objectives owned by the individual users may be determined based on one or more interactions by one or more users with a collaboration environment. In some implementations, one or more users may create and/or assign ownership of one or more business objectives to themselves and/or another user. In some implementations, a user may be assigned to own a business objective and the user may effectuate a reassignment of ownership of the business objective from the user or one or more other users.

Environment state component 108 may be configured to manage information defining project-level graphical user interfaces of the collaboration environment. Managing information defining project-level graphical user interfaces may include determining, obtaining, and/or modifying information used to generate project-level graphical user interfaces. Managing information defining individual project-level graphical user interfaces may include providing information to the user interface component 114 to effectuate presentation of the project-level graphical user interfaces.

In some implementations, individual project-level graphical user interfaces may include individual sets of interface elements displaying the values of one or more of the project parameters of the individual projects. Displaying the values of one or more of the project parameters of the individual projects may include determining visual representations of the values of the one or more project parameters. The visual representations may be one or more of numeric representations, graphical representations (e.g., charts, graphs, etc.), and/or other representations. In some implementations, visual representations may be direct representations. By way of non-limiting illustration, a value of a project parameter may be directly presented in a project-level graphical user interface. For example, a value of a project parameter for a project specifying that the project includes ten tasks may be represented in an interface element as “This project has ten tasks.” In some implementations, visual representations may be indirect representations. By way of non-limiting illustration, a value of a project parameter may be used as a basis for determining a display that represents the value but may not directly and/or explicitly convey the value. By way of non-limiting illustration, a value of a project parameter for a project specifying that the project includes five out of ten tasks already being completed may be represented in an interface element as a pie chart that is half shaded to represent half of the project's tasks being completed.

Given the variety and amount of values of project parameters available for a given project, the generating a detailed overview of a project\ that succinctly and effectively conveys these values may be difficult. From a practical standpoint, a user may only be interested in certain project information. One or more implementations presented herein propose generating the project-level graphical user interfaces without users manually organizing and format the project information in these interfaces. Instead, metrics about how users use the collaboration environment may be determined. Values of these metrics may reflect the type of project information that is important to the users and/or at least consistently viewed and/or interacted with by the users during their use of the collaboration environment. Based on the metrics values of these metrics, templates for the project-level graphical user interfaces may be created and recommended to the users. As such, project-level graphical user interfaces may be preconfigured based on templates that predetermine one or more of the individual interface elements presented therein.

The use metric component 110 may be configured to monitor use of the collaboration environment by the users to determine metric values for use metrics of the users. Individual ones of the use metrics may correspond to individual ones of the project parameters, which may include values of individual ones of the work unit parameters of the units of work associated with the projects. In some implementations, the metric values for the use metrics may characterize the interaction by the users with the collaboration environment which may impact the values of the project parameters.

In some implementations, impact on the values of the project parameters may be measured based on one or more of change in the values, user interaction in relation to the values, and/or other measures of impact.

The change in the values may include user-initiated change, automated change, and/or other changes. Change may be measured based on one or more of quantity of change, frequency of change, character of changes, and/or other information. The character of change may refer to change from one specific value to another specific value. By way of non-limiting illustration, monitoring use of the collaboration environment by a set of users may show that the users consistently update a list of collaborators on a project when users are added and/or removed from working on the project. By way of non-limiting illustration, monitoring use of the collaboration environment by a set of users may show that the users update the description of a project on a monthly basis.

The user interaction in relation to the values may include one or more of viewing, commenting, sharing, tagging, and/or other interactions. Viewing may refer to navigation to a project page displaying a project and/or work unit pages of units of work included in the project. Commenting may include add text, emoticons, and/or other content information comments sections, threads, and/or messages boards. Sharing may include providing links to individual project pages and/or individual units of work. Tagging may include mentioning individual users (e.g., via an “@” symbol pointer to users by username). By way of non-limiting illustration, monitoring use of the collaboration environment by a set of users may show that the users frequently view the completed units of work to determine the number of completed units of work compared to complete units of work. By way of non-limiting illustration, monitoring use of the collaboration environment by a set of users may show that the users frequently comment on units of work having upcoming due dates within a week. By way of non-limiting illustration, monitoring use of the collaboration environment by a set of users may show that the users frequently share digital content items associated with units of work with managers when the units of work are completed. By way of non-limiting illustration, monitoring use of the collaboration environment by a set of users may show that a majority of users tag users assigned to units of work one day before the due date of the units of work and ask for an update.

In some implementations, the monitoring of the use of the collaboration environment to determine the metric values for the use metrics may include monitoring a subset of the users within a group of users working for a given business entity. The subset of the users may include users of a particular role within a business organization. The subset of the users may include users linked to a particular project. In some implementations, projects created by, assigned to, and/or managed by individual users may refer generally to a linking of the project with individual users in the collaboration environment. A project may be linked with a user in a manner that defines one or more relationships between the user and the project. Such a relationship may connote and/or be a result of an action (past, present, and/or future) of the user with respect to the project. Such actions may include one or more of creating a work unit record for a unit of work within the project, being assigned to participate in a unit of work within the project, participating in a unit of work within the project, being granted access to a work unit record of a unit of work within the project, adjusting a value of a work unit parameter of a work unit record of a unit of work within the project, adjusting or defining a value of a project parameter for a project itself, and/or other actions.

The metric values may be determined dynamically on a continuous, semi-continuous, periodic, and/or other basis. By way of non-limiting illustration, continuous my include an on-gong monitoring without specified ending. By way of non-limiting illustration, semi-continuous my include an on-gong monitoring with a specified ending. By way of non-limiting illustration, periodic my include performing monitoring over a specified period of time and/or on a recurring basis for that specified period of time (e.g., monitor for one month every six months).

In some implementations, the template component 112 may create templates for the project-level graphical user interfaces based on the metric values. The templates may pre-configure the project-level graphical user interfaces to include or potentially include one or more interface elements displaying the values of given ones of the project parameters and/or other parameters.

In some implementations, the one or more interface elements pre-configured on the project-level graphical user interfaces by the templates may correspond to the values of the project parameters that have been impacted the most. This may include value(s) having the relatively most change in relation to other values, value(s) having the relatively most user interaction in relation to the values than other values, and/or other considerations. By way of non-limiting illustration, if monitoring use of the collaboration environment by a set of users shows that the users update the description of a project (e.g., which is a value of a project parameter) on a continuing monthly basis, then the description of the project may be determined to have been impacted the most. Accordingly, a template may be created to include at least one interface element preconfigured to display the project description in a project-level graphical user interface for that project. By way of non-limiting illustration, if monitoring use of the collaboration environment by a set of users shows that the users frequently view the completed units of work in a project (which is a value of a project parameter) to determine the number of completed units of work compared to complete units of work, then the completed units of work in a project may be determined to have been impacted the most. Accordingly, a template may be created to include at least one interface element preconfigured to display the number of completed units of work (or a chart showing the relationship between completed and incomplete units of work) in a project-level graphical user interface for that project.

In some implementations, a first template for the first project-level graphical user interface may be created. The first template may include a first set of interface elements having a first subset of interface elements preconfigured by the first template based on the metric values for use metrics of a set of users.

In some implementations, the template component 112 may generate and deliver recommendations including the templates for the project-level graphical user interfaces to one or more computing platforms of one or more of the users. The recommendations may be delivered within the collaboration environment (e.g., a pop-up window) and/or external to the collaboration environment (e.g., external email). In some implementations, recommendations may include previews of the project-level graphical user interfaces based on the templates. In some implementations, recommendations may include descriptions of the preconfigured interface elements corresponding to the templates.

In some implementations, a first recommendation including the first template may be generated and delivered to a first computing platform of a first user.

The template component 112 may implement the templates by generating the project-level graphical user interfaces to reflect the templates for the individual projects. In some implementations, template component 112 may implement the templates by generating the project-level graphical user interfaces in response to user acceptance of a recommendation of a template. Acceptance may be provided through selection of a user interface element (e.g., virtual button) and/or other techniques. In some implementations, project-level graphical user interfaces may include default information (e.g., a project title, for example), along with the one or more interface elements displaying the values of the given ones of the project parameters determined from the monitoring.

The user interface component 114 may be configured to effectuate presentation of user interfaces and/or other displays on individual client computing platforms of one or more client computing platforms 104. The user interface component 114 may be configured to effectuate presentation of the project-level graphical user interfaces for the individual projects in the collaboration environment. The user interface component 114 may be configured to effectuate presentation of recommendations including the templates for the project-level graphical user interfaces. In some implementations, other user interfaces may display one or more of the units of work in work unit pages, business objectives in objective pages, queues of units of work, projects in project pages, and/or other information. In some implementations, project-level graphical user interfaces for the individual projects may be accessed from project pages display the individual projects. By way of non-limiting illustration, a user may provide input to specifically view a project-level graphical user interface from a project page.

In some implementations, environment state information may be updated as users continue to interact with the collaboration environment via the user interfaces over time. The environment state component 108 may store and/or archive the environment state information periodically and/or based on user request to archive. In some implementations, the environment state component 108 may store historical environment state information specifying historical user information, historical work information, historical project information, historical objective information, user interaction history, and/or other information.

In some implementations, user interface component 114 may be configured to obtain input information and/or other information. The input information may convey user input into the user interface presented on the client computing platform(s) 104. A set of user interface elements may be provided on the user interface to facilitate the user input and/or other user interaction with the user interface. The user interface elements may include one or more of text input fields, drop down menus, check boxes, display windows, virtual buttons, and/or other elements configured to facilitate user interaction.

FIG. 3 illustrates a user interface 300, in accordance with one or more implementations. The user interface 300 may include a view of a collaboration environment. In particular, the user interface 300 may show a project page 301 for a project. For illustrative purposes, the project is named “Project X.” Also shown is a view of a display window 302 configured to facilitate creation of a project-level graphical user interface for Project X. For illustrative purposes, the project-level graphical user interface is referred to as a “dashboard.” Within display window 302, a user may be presented options for creating a project-level graphical user interface for Project X. By way of non-limiting illustration, a user interface element 304 may correspond to creation of the project-level graphical user interface from scratch. Selection of user interface element 304 may take the user through a process to configure all and/or most components of the project-level graphical user interface manually.

A user interface element 306 may correspond to a recommendation including a template for the project-level graphical user interface created in accordance with one or more implementations of the present disclosure. The recommendation may include descriptions of the preconfigured interface elements corresponding to the template. For illustrative purposes, the interface elements may be preconfigured to display values of a project parameter indicating completed tasks versus incomplete in a pie chart representation, a visual representation of tasks having upcoming due dates, and a visual representation of value of a project parameter indicating number of collaborators on Project X. Selection of user interface element 306 may implement the template by generating the project-level graphical user interface to reflect the template for Project X (see, e.g., FIG. 4 ).

FIG. 4 illustrates a user interface 400, in accordance with one or more implementations. The user interface 400 may display the project-level graphical user interface 401 for Project X reflecting the template. For illustrative purposes, the project-level graphical user interface 401 for Project X is referred to in the figure as “Project X Dashboard.” The project-level graphical user interface 401 for Project X may include a set of interface elements displaying the values of one or more of the project parameters of Project X. For illustrative purposes, FIG. 4 shows three interface elements displaying values for one or more project parameters that correspond to the template of FIG. 3 , however, one or more other interface elements may be included. By way of non-limiting illustration, the project-level graphical user interface 401 may include one or more of a first interface element 402, a second interface element 404, a third interface element 406, and/or other interface elements. The first interface element 402 may display a visual representation of a value of a project parameter indicating number of collaborators on Project X. The second interface element 404 may display a pie chart representation of values of the project parameter of Project X indicating completed tasks versus incomplete. The third interface element 406 may display a list representation of tasks within Project X having upcoming due dates, along with work unit information about the tasks (e.g., task name, assignee, due date, etc.).

Referring back to FIG. 1 , in some implementations, server(s) 102, client computing platform(s) 104, and/or external resources 126 may be operatively linked via one or more electronic communication links. For example, such electronic communication links may be established, at least in part, via a network 116 such as the Internet and/or other networks. It will be appreciated that this is not intended to be limiting, and that the scope of this disclosure includes implementations in which server(s) 102, client computing platform(s) 104, and/or external resources 126 may be operatively linked via some other communication media.

A given client computing platform may include one or more processors configured to execute computer program components. The computer program components may be configured to enable an expert or user associated with the given client computing platform to interface with system 100 and/or external resources 126, and/or provide other functionality attributed herein to client computing platform(s) 104. By way of non-limiting example, the given client computing platform 104 may include one or more of a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a tablet computing platform, a NetBook, a Smartphone, a gaming console, and/or other computing platforms.

External resources 126 may include sources of information outside of system 100, external entities participating with system 100, and/or other resources. In some implementations, some or all of the functionality attributed herein to external resources 126 may be provided by resources included in system 100.

Server(s) 102 may include electronic storage 128, one or more processors 130, and/or other components. Server(s) 102 may include communication lines, or ports to enable the exchange of information with a network 116 and/or other computing platforms. Illustration of server(s) 102 in FIG. 1 is not intended to be limiting. Server(s) 102 may include a plurality of hardware, software, and/or firmware components operating together to provide the functionality attributed herein to server(s) 102. For example, server(s) 102 may be implemented by a cloud of computing platforms operating together as server(s) 102.

Electronic storage 128 may comprise non-transitory storage media that electronically stores information. The electronic storage media of electronic storage 128 may include one or both of system storage that is provided integrally (i.e., substantially non-removable) with server(s) 102 and/or removable storage that is removably connectable to server(s) 102 via, for example, a port (e.g., a USB port, a firewire port, etc.) or a drive (e.g., a disk drive, etc.). Electronic storage 128 may include one or more of optically readable storage media (e.g., optical disks, etc.), magnetically readable storage media (e.g., magnetic tape, magnetic hard drive, floppy drive, etc.), electrical charge-based storage media (e.g., EEPROM, RAM, etc.), solid-state storage media (e.g., flash drive, etc.), and/or other electronically readable storage media. Electronic storage 128 may include one or more virtual storage resources (e.g., cloud storage, a virtual private network, and/or other virtual storage resources). Electronic storage 128 may store software algorithms, information determined by processor(s) 130, information received from server(s) 102, information received from client computing platform(s) 104, and/or other information that enables server(s) 102 to function as described herein.

Processor(s) 130 may be configured to provide information processing capabilities in server(s) 102. As such, processor(s) 130 may include one or more of a digital processor, a physical processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information. Although processor(s) 130 is shown in FIG. 1 as a single entity, this is for illustrative purposes only. In some implementations, processor(s) 130 may include a plurality of processing units. These processing units may be physically located within the same device, or processor(s) 130 may represent processing functionality of a plurality of devices operating in coordination. Processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute components 108, 110, 112, 114, and/or other components. Processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114, and/or other components by software; hardware; firmware; some combination of software, hardware, and/or firmware; and/or other mechanisms for configuring processing capabilities on processor(s) 130. As used herein, the term “component” may refer to any component or set of components that perform the functionality attributed to the component. This may include one or more physical processors during execution of processor readable instructions, the processor readable instructions, circuitry, hardware, storage media, or any other components.

It should be appreciated that although components 108, 110, 112 and/or 114 are illustrated in FIG. 1 as being implemented within a single processing unit, in implementations in which processor(s) 130 includes multiple processing units, one or more of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 may be implemented remotely from the other components. The description of the functionality provided by the different components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 described below is for illustrative purposes, and is not intended to be limiting, as any of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 may provide more or less functionality than is described. For example, one or more of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 may be eliminated, and some or all of its functionality may be provided by other ones of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114. As another example, processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute one or more additional components that may perform some or all of the functionality attributed below to one of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114.

FIG. 2 illustrates a method 200 to recommend templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations. The operations of method 200 presented below are intended to be illustrative. In some implementations, method 200 may be accomplished with one or more additional operations not described, and/or without one or more of the operations discussed. Additionally, the order in which the operations of method 200 are illustrated in FIG. 2 and described below is not intended to be limiting.

In some implementations, method 200 may be implemented in one or more processing devices (e.g., a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information). The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices executing some or all of the operations of method 200 in response to instructions stored electronically on an electronic storage medium. The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices configured through hardware, firmware, and/or software to be specifically designed for execution of one or more of the operations of method 200.

An operation 202 may manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment and/or other information. The collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment. The environment state information may include work unit records, project records, and/or other records. The work unit records may include values of work unit parameters associated with units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment. The project records may include values for the project parameters associated with projects managed within the collaboration environment. An individual project may include an individual set of the units of work. Operation 202 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to environment state component 108, in accordance with one or more implementations.

An operation 204 may manage information defining project-level graphical user interfaces of the collaboration environment. The individual project-level graphical user interfaces may correspond to individual projects. By way of non-limiting illustration, the individual project-level graphical user interfaces may include individual sets of interface elements displaying the values of one or more of the project parameters of the individual projects. A first project-level graphical user interface may be associated with a first project. Operation 204 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to environment state component 108, in accordance with one or more implementations.

An operation 206 may monitor use of the collaboration environment by the users to determine metric values for use metrics of the users. Operation 206 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to use metric component 110, in accordance with one or more implementations.

An operation 208 may create templates for the project-level graphical user interfaces based on the metric values. The templates may pre-configure the project-level graphical user interfaces to include one or more interface elements displaying the values of given ones of the project parameters. By way of non-limiting illustration, a first template for the first project-level graphical user interface may be created. The first template may include a first set of interface elements having a first subset of interface elements preconfigured by the first template based on the metric values. Operation 208 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to template component 112, in accordance with one or more implementations.

An operation 210 may effectuate presentation of the project-level graphical user interfaces for the individual projects in the collaboration environment. Operation 210 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to user interface component 114, in accordance with one or more implementations.

Although the present technology has been described in detail for the purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to be the most practical and preferred implementations, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that the technology is not limited to the disclosed implementations, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications and equivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it is to be understood that the present technology contemplates that, to the extent possible, one or more features of any implementation can be combined with one or more features of any other implementation. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system configured to recommend templates for project dashboards of a collaboration environment, the system comprising: one or more physical processors configured by machine-readable instructions to: manage, by a server, information defining a user interface of a collaboration environment, the user interface providing users with access to project records of the collaboration environment, the project records including project information describing projects managed by the collaboration environment, the project records being accessed through project pages and project dashboards of the user interface, the project pages displaying sets of the project information included in the project records, the project dashboards displaying subsets of the project information included in the project records, the project pages including a first project page displaying a first set of project information included in a first project record, monitor, by the server, use of the collaboration environment by one or more of the users via one or more remotely located client computing platforms communicating with the server over one or more Internet connections, wherein the use of the collaboration environment derives metric values for use metrics for the one or more of the users; create, by the server and based on the metric values, template information defining a first template that pre-configures an individual project dashboard to include one or more interface elements displaying some of the project information included in an individual project record; generate, by the server, a first recommendation recommending the first template to a first user; effectuate communication of information defining the first recommendation from the server to a first remotely located client computing platform associated the first user over the one or more Internet connections so that the first remotely located client computing platform presents the first recommendation; responsive to acceptance of the first recommendation, implement, by the server, the first template by generating first dashboard information defining a first project dashboard for the first project record that reflects the first template, the first project dashboard supplementing the first project page by displaying a first subset of project information included in the first project record; and effectuate communication of the first dashboard information from the server to the first remotely located client computing platform over the one or more Internet connections so that the first remotely located client computing platform presents the first project dashboard.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the use metrics correspond to use of the collaboration environment which impacts the project information of one or more of the project records.
 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the first template preconfigures the first project dashboard with some project information included in the first project record that is of a type that has been impacted the most.
 4. The system of claim 3, wherein impact is measured based on change in the project information.
 5. The system of claim 3, wherein impact is measured based on one or more of viewing the project records, commenting on the project records, sharing the project records, or tagging other users in comments.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more of the users includes a subset of the users.
 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the subset of the users includes users of a particular role within a business organization.
 8. The system of claim 6, wherein the subset of the users includes users linked to a particular project.
 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the metric values are determined dynamically on a continuous or semi-continuous basis.
 10. The system of claim 1, further comprising non-transitory electronic storage storing environment state information maintaining the collaboration environment, the environment state information including the project records.
 11. A method to recommend templates for project dashboards within a collaboration environment, the method comprising: managing, by a server, by a server, information defining a user interface of a collaboration environment, the user interface providing users with access to project records of the collaboration environment, the project records including project information describing projects managed by the collaboration environment, the project records being accessed through project pages and project dashboards of the user interface, the project pages displaying sets of the project information included in the project records, the project dashboards displaying subsets of the project information included in the project records, the project pages including a first project page displaying a first set of project information included in a first project record, monitoring, by the server, use of the collaboration environment by one or more of the users via one or more remotely located client computing platforms communicating with the server over one or more Internet connections, wherein the use of the collaboration environment derives metric values for use metrics for the one or more of the users; creating, by the server and based on the metric values, template information defining a first template that pre-configures an individual project dashboard to include one or more interface elements displaying some of the project information included in an individual project record; generating, by the server, a first recommendation recommending the first template to a first user; effectuating communication of information defining the first recommendation from the server to a first remotely located client computing platform associated the first user over the one or more Internet connections so that the first remotely located client computing platform presents the first recommendation; responsive to acceptance of the first recommendation, implement, by the server, the first template by generating first dashboard information defining a first project dashboard for the first project record that reflects the first template, the first project dashboard supplementing the first project page by displaying a first subset of project information included in the first project record; and effectuating communication of the first dashboard information from the server to the first remotely located client computing platform over the one or more Internet connections so that the first remotely located client computing platform presents the first project dashboard.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the use metrics correspond to use of the collaboration environment which impacts the project information of one or more of the project records.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the first template preconfigures the first project dashboard with some project information included in the first project record that is of a type that has been impacted the most.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein impact is measured based on change in the project information.
 15. The method of claim 13, wherein impact is measured based on one or more of viewing the project records, commenting on the project records, sharing the project records, or tagging other users in comments.
 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the one or more of the users includes a subset of the users.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the subset of the users includes users of a particular role within a business organization.
 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the subset of the users includes users linked to a particular project.
 19. The method of claim 11, wherein the metric values are determined dynamically on a continuous or semi-continuous basis.
 20. The method of claim 11, further comprising obtaining electronically stored environment state information maintaining the collaboration environment, the environment state information including the project records. 